From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36866) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSQC0-00072G-3W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 06:01:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSQBv-000612-DL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 06:01:51 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:30572) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSQBv-00060n-5I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 06:01:47 -0400 Message-ID: <4FAB9204.9090109@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 12:01:40 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1336555446-20180-1-git-send-email-jim@meyering.net> In-Reply-To: <1336555446-20180-1-git-send-email-jim@meyering.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] strncpy: best avoided (resend) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jim Meyering Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori Am 09.05.2012 11:23, schrieb Jim Meyering: > [Argh. First attempt omitted the most important address: qemu-devel. > Sorry to all who get two copies. ] > > Given qemu's HACKING comments, I'm sure many here have read "man strncpy", > where it indicates it is often not the best function to use. Anthony, I think it's best if you (or any other committer) can take the whole series at once, so I didn't pick up the block patches in it but just added my Acked-by. Hope that's okay with you. Kevin