From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48656) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSR2A-0008LE-SP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 06:55:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSR29-0002Mp-47 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 06:55:46 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15065) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSR28-0002Me-SM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 06:55:45 -0400 Message-ID: <4FAB9EA8.8050502@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 13:55:36 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1333502154-23999-1-git-send-email-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> <4F7C0944.3050209@redhat.com> <4FAAEE6D.3030608@codemonkey.ws> <4FAB89ED.2040500@redhat.com> <4FAB9D35.2010402@web.de> In-Reply-To: <4FAB9D35.2010402@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RESEND] kvm: Fix dirty tracking with large kernel page size List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori , David Gibson On 05/10/2012 01:49 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-05-10 06:27, Avi Kivity wrote: > > On 05/10/2012 01:23 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> On 04/04/2012 03:41 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > >>> On 04/04/2012 04:15 AM, David Gibson wrote: > >>>> If the kernel page size is larger than TARGET_PAGE_SIZE, which > >>>> happens for example on ppc64 with kernels compiled for 64K pages, > >>>> the dirty tracking doesn't work. > >>>> > >>>> Cc: Avi Kivity > >>>> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti > >>>> > >>> > >>> Thanks, applied to uq/master. > >> > >> Can ya'll send a PULL request for 1.1 with any bug fixes from uq/master? > > > > Sure, I'll trawl the list for missed patches (Jan, any known?) and let > > autotest at it. > > Don't recall any ATM for which there wasn't a "thanks, applied". > Okay, so we have that one patch. Since it's a nop for x86, which is the only thing I test, I'll push it along. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function