From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42575) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSSLN-0004rM-2S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 08:19:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSSLK-0005Gb-Mz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 08:19:40 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:42916) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSSLK-0005Fd-J4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 08:19:38 -0400 Received: by obbwd20 with SMTP id wd20so2054609obb.4 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 05:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FABB253.8030000@codemonkey.ws> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 07:19:31 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1333451753-3550-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1333451753-3550-24-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20120509200128.GA30337@thinkpad.mammed.net> <4FAB68B1.5080807@redhat.com> <4FAB91F8.5020908@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <4FAB91F8.5020908@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 23/25] qom: add realized property List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Cc: Paolo Bonzini , aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Igor Mammedov On 05/10/2012 05:01 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 10.05.2012 09:05, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: >> Il 09/05/2012 22:01, Igor Mammedov ha scritto: >>> Hi Paolo, >>> >>> Are you plannig to respin this and related patches? >>> If yes, when? >> >> After the first part goes in (21 patches including Anthony's bus >> series). A reviewed-by from Andreas or Anthony would help, so that I >> can make Andreas's suggested documentation changes and send a pull >> request to someone. >> >> Andreas, would you object to being honorary maintainer of qom-next for >> this month? > > Sometimes there's so many trees that one doesn't see the forrest... I > brought that topic up in > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-05/msg00926.html: > >> there's more and more colliding patch series on the list - >> fixed-width visitors, realize, QBus, VMState, AREG0, CPU - for which we >> need a strategy to coordinate our ongoing development and post-1.1 >> merging. Someone needs to rebase on someone else, question is whom. > > If Anthony is okay with me maintaining a qom-next branch then I'd > happily do that! It doesn't relieve us of reviewing and acking each > other's patches though. And in particular we need to figure out how to > proceed with your and Anthony's series - I have stated opinions on some > parts, but it's Anthony's baby. Yeah, I'd be more than happy with you maintaining a qom-next tree. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > Also, I still think there's at least one patch in your series that > should go into 1.1 (the -device fix thingy). > > Andreas >