From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52354)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1SSXFQ-0005WE-JA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 13:33:53 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1SSXFJ-0005AG-W0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 13:33:52 -0400
Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:51050)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1SSXFJ-00059j-R1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 13:33:45 -0400
Received: by obbwd20 with SMTP id wd20so2436582obb.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 10 May 2012 10:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4FABFBF5.30002@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 12:33:41 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1336555446-20180-1-git-send-email-jim@meyering.net>
	<4FAB9204.9090109@redhat.com> <87aa1grpl8.fsf@rho.meyering.net>
In-Reply-To: <87aa1grpl8.fsf@rho.meyering.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] strncpy: best avoided (resend)
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 05/10/2012 11:02 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 09.05.2012 11:23, schrieb Jim Meyering:
>>> [Argh.  First attempt omitted the most important address: qemu-devel.
>>>   Sorry to all who get two copies. ]
>>>
>>> Given qemu's HACKING comments, I'm sure many here have read "man strncpy",
>>> where it indicates it is often not the best function to use.
>>
>> Anthony, I think it's best if you (or any other committer) can take the
>> whole series at once, so I didn't pick up the block patches in it but
>> just added my Acked-by. Hope that's okay with you.
>
> I can post a V2 series (with ACK and Reviewed-by comments already added)
> or push to a publicly accessible git server if that helps.

Sorry, I didn't realize that you had updated patches in responses.  Yes, please 
do post a v2.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori