From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36604) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSnwN-0006T0-9u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 07:23:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSnwG-0004Ei-J8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 07:23:18 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:54042 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSnwG-0004Ea-Dk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 07:23:12 -0400 Message-ID: <4FACF69A.2030603@suse.de> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 13:23:06 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1336608892-30501-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <1336608892-30501-34-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH next v2 33/74] pxa2xx: Use cpu_arm_init() and store ARMCPU List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 11.05.2012 13:16, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 10 May 2012 01:14, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: >> Also use cpu_reset() in place of cpu_state_reset(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas F=C3=A4rber >=20 > The pxa2xx stuff is probably going to clash with the cp15 > rework, but I guess we'll sort that out when one or the > other of these series hits master. My plan is to pull cp15 in to qom-next actually. :) I hope to get the ARM parts of this series applied and anything needed for cpu_copy(), then some way to fix cpu_copy(), and then apply your cp15 on top. That's the whole point of qom-next: avoiding clashes on mast= er. Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC= rnberg