From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
anthony@codemonkey.ws, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] qemu pci: pci_add_capability enhancement to prevent damaging config space
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 22:47:11 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FAD0A4F.2050506@ozlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6A22E211-BC82-49BD-A335-02D3BAA14A17@suse.de>
11.05.2012 20:52, Alexander Graf написал:
>
> On 11.05.2012, at 08:45, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>
>> Normally the pci_add_capability is called on devices to add new
>> capability. This is ok for emulated devices which capabilities list
>> is being built by QEMU.
>>
>> In the case of VFIO the capability may already exist and adding new
>> capability into the beginning of the linked list may create a loop.
>>
>> For example, the old code destroys the following config
>> of PCIe Intel E1000E:
>>
>> before adding PCI_CAP_ID_MSI (0x05):
>> 0x34: 0xC8
>> 0xC8: 0x01 0xD0
>> 0xD0: 0x05 0xE0
>> 0xE0: 0x10 0x00
>>
>> after:
>> 0x34: 0xD0
>> 0xC8: 0x01 0xD0
>> 0xD0: 0x05 0xC8
>> 0xE0: 0x10 0x00
>>
>> As result capabilities 0x01 and 0x05 point to each other.
>>
>> The proposed patch does not change capability pointers when
>> the same type capability is about to add.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>> ---
>> hw/pci.c | 10 ++++++----
>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/pci.c b/hw/pci.c
>> index aa0c0b8..1f7c924 100644
>> --- a/hw/pci.c
>> +++ b/hw/pci.c
>> @@ -1794,10 +1794,12 @@ int pci_add_capability(PCIDevice *pdev, uint8_t cap_id,
>> }
>>
>> config = pdev->config + offset;
>> - config[PCI_CAP_LIST_ID] = cap_id;
>> - config[PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT] = pdev->config[PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST];
>> - pdev->config[PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST] = offset;
>> - pdev->config[PCI_STATUS] |= PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST;
>> + if (config[PCI_CAP_LIST_ID] != cap_id) {
>
> This doesn't scale. Capabilities are a list of CAPs. You'll have to do a loop through all capabilities, check if the one you want to add is there already and if so either
> * replace the existing one or
> * drop out and not write the new one in.
>
> I'm not sure which way would be more natural.
There is a third option - add another function, lets call it
pci_fixup_capability() which would do whatever pci_add_capability() does
but won't touch list pointers.
When vfio, pci_add_capability() is called from the code which knows
exactly that the capability exists and where it is and it calls
pci_add_capability() based on this knowledge so doing additional loops
just for imaginery scalability is a bit weird, no?
>> + config[PCI_CAP_LIST_ID] = cap_id;
>> + config[PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT] = pdev->config[PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST];
>> + pdev->config[PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST] = offset;
>> + pdev->config[PCI_STATUS] |= PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST;
>> + }
>> memset(pdev->used + offset, 0xFF, size);
>> /* Make capability read-only by default */
>> memset(pdev->wmask + offset, 0, size);
--
With best regards
Alexey Kardashevskiy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-11 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-11 6:45 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] qemu pci: pci_add_capability enhancement to prevent damaging config space Alexey Kardashevskiy
2012-05-11 10:52 ` Alexander Graf
2012-05-11 12:47 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy [this message]
2012-05-11 14:13 ` Alexander Graf
2012-05-14 3:49 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2012-05-18 5:12 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2012-05-22 2:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-05-22 3:21 ` Alexander Graf
2012-05-22 3:44 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2012-05-22 5:52 ` Alexander Graf
2012-05-22 6:11 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2012-05-22 6:31 ` Alexander Graf
2012-05-22 7:01 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2012-05-22 7:13 ` Alexander Graf
2012-05-22 7:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-06-08 8:47 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2012-06-08 10:56 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-06-08 11:16 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2012-06-08 11:30 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-06-08 14:00 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2012-06-08 14:43 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-06-08 14:56 ` Alex Williamson
2012-06-08 15:05 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-06-08 15:22 ` Alex Williamson
2012-05-22 6:38 ` Alexander Graf
2012-05-11 19:20 ` Jason Baron
2012-05-12 0:27 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2012-05-14 2:37 ` Alex Williamson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-11 6:59 Alexey Kardashevskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FAD0A4F.2050506@ozlabs.ru \
--to=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).