From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49071) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSrCt-00085C-RM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 10:52:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSrCl-0005OS-B1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 10:52:35 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:18996) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSrCl-0005OM-3D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 10:52:27 -0400 Message-ID: <4FAD27A4.9000806@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 22:52:20 +0800 From: Amos Kong MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20120511021531.14819.78211.stgit@t> <4FACB4E4.2070708@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4FACB4E4.2070708@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qom: fix refcounting in object_property_del_child() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 05/11/2012 02:42 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 11/05/2012 04:15, Amos Kong ha scritto: >> Start VM with 8 multiple-function block devs, hot-removing >> those block devs by 'device_del ...' would cause qemu abort. >> >> object_ref() is called in object_property_add_child(), >> but we don't unref it in object_property_del_child(). >> >> | (qemu) device_del virti0-0-0 >> | (qemu) ** >> | ERROR:qom/object.c:389:object_delete: assertion failed: (obj->ref == 0) >> >> Signed-off-by: Amos Kong >> --- >> qom/object.c | 1 + >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/qom/object.c b/qom/object.c >> index e721fc2..9da6b59 100644 >> --- a/qom/object.c >> +++ b/qom/object.c >> @@ -320,6 +320,7 @@ static void object_property_del_child(Object *obj, Object *child, Error **errp) >> QTAILQ_FOREACH(prop, &obj->properties, node) { >> if (strstart(prop->type, "child<", NULL) && prop->opaque == child) { >> object_property_del(obj, prop->name, errp); >> + object_unref(child); > > This should be called by object_finalize_child_property instead, can you > check why this is not the case? Yes, original ref/unref are right. I will post another patch to fix this issue. NAK this patch. > Paolo Thanks! -- Amos.