From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47347) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STq8V-0006iV-EV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 03:56:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STq8Q-00068e-S0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 03:56:07 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13278) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STq8Q-00068N-KS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 03:56:02 -0400 Message-ID: <4FB0BA8D.1010806@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 09:55:57 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4FACB4E4.2070708@redhat.com> <20120511145725.16518.77110.stgit@t> <20120513105419.GA23755@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20120513105419.GA23755@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: unplug all devs of same slot once List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, Amos Kong , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Il 13/05/2012 12:54, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: > This was done as part of 57c9fafe0f759c9f1efa5451662b3627f9bb95e0. > Should we just call object_unparent before qdev_free? > Anthony? Or just call object_unparent in object_delete? Paolo