From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34803) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STvaw-0001aK-4v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 09:45:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STvap-0007jR-I4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 09:45:49 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39408) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STvap-0007j7-94 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 09:45:43 -0400 Message-ID: <4FB10C81.6090003@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 15:45:37 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1336749740-18474-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <1336749740-18474-2-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <4FB10989.1040709@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <4FB10989.1040709@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/2] Un-inline fdctrl_init_isa() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: hpoussin@reactos.org, Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 14.05.2012 15:32, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > On 05/11/2012 10:22 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster > > Reviewed-by: Anthony Liguori > > I know this is a pervasive idiom, but it makes little sense to me and I've got a > number of similar changes queued up myself. The patch makes sense on its own, so I applied it to block-next now even though the series is just an RFC. We can still update or drop it in the unlikely case that we find that it's actually a stupid thing to do. Kevin