From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: zwu.kernel@gmail.com
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qcow2: adjust qcow2_co_flush_to_os -> qcow2_co_flush_to_disk
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 16:04:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB110E1.90103@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337003481-30215-1-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@gmail.com>
Am 14.05.2012 15:51, schrieb zwu.kernel@gmail.com:
> From: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> qcow2_co_flush_to_os() actually flush all cached data to the disk. To keep its name consistent with its actual function, adjust its name accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This patch is plain wrong.
You're aware that you're not changing a name, but functionality here?
Have a look at block_int.h for the semantics of each function:
/*
* Flushes all data that was already written to the OS all the way
down to
* the disk (for example raw-posix calls fsync()).
*/
int coroutine_fn (*bdrv_co_flush_to_disk)(BlockDriverState *bs);
/*
* Flushes all internal caches to the OS. The data may still sit in a
* writeback cache of the host OS, but it will survive a crash of
the qemu
* process.
*/
int coroutine_fn (*bdrv_co_flush_to_os)(BlockDriverState *bs);
Apart from that, it's not even intentional that qcow2 does a
bdrv_flush() even if it didn't write out any cache entries. If we
optimise the cache code a bit, this might disappear in the future.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-14 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-14 13:51 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qcow2: adjust qcow2_co_flush_to_os -> qcow2_co_flush_to_disk zwu.kernel
2012-05-14 14:04 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2012-05-14 14:27 ` Zhi Yong Wu
2012-05-14 14:39 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-05-14 14:54 ` Zhi Yong Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FB110E1.90103@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=zwu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).