From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58729)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1SUTVL-0007cj-JQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 21:58:20 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1SUTVH-0007b6-Ta
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 21:58:19 -0400
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56937 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1SUTVH-0007ao-Nx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 21:58:15 -0400
Message-ID: <4FB309AE.2030304@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 03:58:06 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4FB27EA1.4080800@us.ibm.com> <4FB28574.1080900@weilnetz.de>
	<4FB28693.30205@codemonkey.ws>
	<CAFEAcA9WaqSczVobgPaupjWN=56-gaA3Frs0B9PcBYZytfnQzA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FB2BA9A.9040101@codemonkey.ws>
	<CAFEAcA-B=FQvYSE=sDwe9tpQB5iZ-4Tu4xz3QMoo1A3VgKH8FQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-B=FQvYSE=sDwe9tpQB5iZ-4Tu4xz3QMoo1A3VgKH8FQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [ANNOUNCE] QEMU 1.1-rc2 release
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>

Am 15.05.2012 22:33, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 15 May 2012 21:20, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
>> [If it's] not tagged '1.1' than I am not considering it for 1.1.
>>
>> If it's tagged with 1.1 *and* in a subsystem with an active submaintai=
ner, I
>> would expect the submaintainer to handle it.  I do keep track of it th=
ough
>> until someone responds with "Thanks, Applied." and will follow up with
>> patches that fall into this category.
>=20
>> If you've posted a patch for 1.1 and it's a couple days old without
>> feedback, then you probably should ping the appropriate maintainer abo=
ut it.
>>
>> FWIW, I don't see any pending 1.1 patches from you so I don't know if =
this
>> is a theoretical concern or a practical one.
>=20
> My current concern is
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/158556/
> (submitted by Alex, although I see he forgot to tag it with "1.1").

Also forgot "v2" fwiw. ;)

>=20
> I'll ping it...
>=20
> -- PMM

/-F

--=20
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC=
rnberg