qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Zhi Yong Wu <zwu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
	Benjamin <mlspirat42@gmail.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [QEMU] net: adapt dump to support the new syntax
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 11:51:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB4CA2D.4080501@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEH94Lg=p8ie218H9SnHLqtw1rbBEKC7oaXCj9hw1AEC-LN58A@mail.gmail.com>

Il 17/05/2012 07:59, Zhi Yong Wu ha scritto:
>> > However, then I noticed that qemu_can_send_packet is not called very much,
>> > and I do not understand why qemu_net_queue_send and qemu_net_queue_send_iov
>> > do not call qemu_can_send_packet before calling deliver/deliver_iov.
> This case has existed in current upstream code, not only vlan-hub
> code. Currently can_send function has been called by backend send
> function before deliver/deliver_iov, If we put can_send in queue send
> function, your idea will have a big challenge for slirp packet queue.

Exactly why?  For SLIRP's receive path, SLIRP doesn't implement
can_receive at all so it will never block.  For the send path, when flow
control kicks qemu_net_queue_append will copy the packet so it is not a
problem for SLIRP's stack-allocated packets.

> We can implement your idea below later, not in this patchset. What do
> you think?

Note that my idea above was only means to an end.  If you can remove the
TODOs in a convincing manner, that would be fine.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-17  9:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4F1EF6CE.9060306@gmail.com>
2012-01-24 10:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [QEMU] net: adapt dump to support the new syntax Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-01-24 11:58   ` Markus Armbruster
2012-02-05 16:30     ` Benjamin
2012-02-05 22:18   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-05-17  5:24     ` Zhi Yong Wu
2012-05-17  5:59     ` Zhi Yong Wu
2012-05-17  9:51       ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-05-17 10:05         ` Zhi Yong Wu
2012-05-17 13:29           ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-02-17  6:54   ` Zhi Yong Wu
2012-02-17 10:55     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-02-18  4:16       ` Zhi Yong Wu
2012-02-18  8:57       ` Zhi Yong Wu
2012-02-18  9:48         ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-02-18 10:48           ` Zhi Yong Wu
2012-02-19 15:33       ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FB4CA2D.4080501@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=mlspirat42@gmail.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    --cc=zwu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).