From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix legacy device aliases for s390
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 19:28:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB597A2.7030600@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D8323D23-421C-4DA8-816D-80BB95AA5DC4@suse.de>
On 05/17/2012 05:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 03.05.2012, at 15:34, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>>
>> On 03.05.2012, at 14:32, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/03/2012 04:07 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 03.05.2012, at 11:05, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> The usual old fix was to not even compile them in. Why are they in
>>>>>>> the alias list in the s390 build now?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because the alias list is in target-independent code.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The old fix was brittle anyway, it dependent on the fact that
>>>>>> virtio-blk-pci was not part of libhw. A similar trick broke for
>>>>>> cirrus-vga when it became part of libhw.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christian fix is correct.
>>>>>
>>>>> Uhm, Christian fix would have the same problem actually if
>>>>> virtio-*-pci were to be moved in libhw. IIRC I proposed the
>>>>> same change on review and Anthony nacked it on these grounds.
>>>>> You could move the alias list to target-dependent code, though.
>>>>
>>>> Can't we just make the virtio-*-pci variants fail instantiation and based on that search the list on?
>>>
>>> No, but you could do:
>>
>> Ah, nice. Here is a fixed (and tested) version:
>
> Ping? What do we do about this one?
Are you going to submit your fixed and tested version as a proper patch?
You can add my SoB if you need to.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
>
> Alex
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-18 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-03 8:47 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix legacy device aliases for s390 Christian Borntraeger
2012-05-03 8:49 ` Alexander Graf
2012-05-03 8:53 ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-05-03 8:55 ` Alexander Graf
2012-05-03 9:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-05-03 9:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-05-03 9:07 ` Alexander Graf
2012-05-03 9:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-05-03 12:32 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-05-03 13:34 ` Alexander Graf
2012-05-17 22:57 ` Alexander Graf
2012-05-18 0:28 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FB597A2.7030600@us.ibm.com \
--to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).