From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SVOn8-0003uQ-6c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 11:08:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SVOn6-0001Ej-Gs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 11:08:29 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:4936) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SVOn6-0001EZ-9E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 11:08:28 -0400 Message-ID: <4FB66622.7000500@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 17:09:22 +0200 From: Laszlo Ersek MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1337265221-7136-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <1337265221-7136-15-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1337265221-7136-15-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 14/16] net: net_client_init(): use error_set() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Luiz Capitulino Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com On 05/17/12 16:33, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > @@ -1244,8 +1247,10 @@ int do_netdev_add(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict, QObject **ret_data) > return -1; > } > > - res = net_client_init(opts, 1); > + res = net_client_init(opts, 1, &local_err); > if (res < 0) { > + qerror_report_err(local_err); > + error_free(local_err); > qemu_opts_del(opts); > } > I think this is the only net_client_init() caller hunk where we rely on the retval instead of error_is_set(); but again, they seem to be equivalent -- all branches in net_client_init() have been converted AFAICS. (I can see that do_netdev_add() might set "local_err" higher up, and then check "opts" again, instead of error_is_set(), but qemu_opts_from_qdict() returns/sets those equivalently as well, so we could use error_is_set() both times in do_netdev_add(), I think. Anyway, it's OK.) Laszlo