From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53363) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWTlW-0002hB-U4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 10:39:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWTlQ-000566-Nw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 10:39:18 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:31334) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWTlQ-00055m-G3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 10:39:12 -0400 Message-ID: <4FBA5389.5030202@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 16:39:05 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4FB6821A.1080902@redhat.com> <20120521105901.4fbe7363@doriath.home> In-Reply-To: <20120521105901.4fbe7363@doriath.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Proposal for extensions of block job commands in QEMU 1.2 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Luiz Capitulino Cc: Kevin Wolf , aliguori@us.ibm.com, Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel , Federico Simoncelli , Eric Blake Il 21/05/2012 15:59, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto: > I understand your reasoning, and since the beginning I thought this was > something useful to do, but we've already settled for not doing this. > > I also think that we shouldn't have exceptions, as in practice this means > we're extending commands anyway. So either, we do it or we don't. Ok, I don't really care... streaming works decently even without this extension, it is only needed for mirroring (and only 1 patch to leave out of the series). Paolo