From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45552)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <webmaster@rdsoftware.de>) id 1SWVsf-000354-T7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 12:54:51 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <webmaster@rdsoftware.de>) id 1SWVse-0004Fw-5I
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 12:54:49 -0400
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:50754)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <webmaster@rdsoftware.de>) id 1SWVsd-0004FK-S0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 12:54:48 -0400
Message-ID: <4FBA735D.4010701@rdsoftware.de>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 18:54:53 +0200
From: Erik Rull <webmaster@rdsoftware.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Current differences between qemu --enable-kvm and
	qemu-kvm?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Hi all,

is there a summary existing that shows up the rough or actual differences 
between qemu --enable-kvm and qemu-kvm? I tested both versions with the 
same compile and start options, the CPU performance results are identical, 
only the bootup time of my guest system with qemu-kvm seemed to be a bit 
faster (not measured, it just feeled so).

Thanks.

Best regards,

Erik