From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57050)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1SWd3W-0004Ns-8B
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 20:34:32 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1SWd3U-00007O-9p
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 20:34:29 -0400
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60997 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1SWd3U-000070-0s
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 20:34:28 -0400
Message-ID: <4FBADF0B.2080705@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 02:34:19 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1336608892-30501-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de>
	<4FB12FA8.8050109@suse.de>
	<CAAu8pHsde4z_3RxdTWOw2obsQiXA8ZXxc==R0JrBRgs7CbuAXw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FB17249.1070205@suse.de>
	<CAAu8pHudCUsOjSj5hmmS9Taa=WqyHGHJ0G3PvjGFCJ-T=mdknA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FBA062F.8020604@suse.de>
	<CAAu8pHu14mCMnVOPoi3xHb7XLjAuu_ez8B=w6Bngzc9h4cFXOA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAu8pHu14mCMnVOPoi3xHb7XLjAuu_ez8B=w6Bngzc9h4cFXOA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH next v2 00/74] QOM CPUState,
 part 3: CPU reset
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>, Fabien Chouteau <chouteau@adacore.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Am 21.05.2012 20:20, schrieb Blue Swirl:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Andreas F=C3=A4rber <afaerber@suse.de>=
 wrote:
>> Am 14.05.2012 23:22, schrieb Blue Swirl:
>>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Andreas F=C3=A4rber <afaerber@suse.d=
e> wrote:
>>>> Am 14.05.2012 21:54, schrieb Blue Swirl:
>>>>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Andreas F=C3=A4rber <afaerber@suse=
.de> wrote:
>>>>>> Am 10.05.2012 02:13, schrieb Andreas F=C3=A4rber:
>>>>>>> Andreas F=C3=A4rber (74):
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>   target-sparc: Let cpu_sparc_init() return SPARCCPU
>>>>>>>   sun4m: Use cpu_sparc_init() to obtain SPARCCPU
>>>>>>>   sun4m: Pass SPARCCPU to {main,secondary}_cpu_reset()
>>>>>>>   sun4u: Use cpu_sparc_init() to obtain SPARCCPU
>>>>>>>   sun4u: Let cpu_devinit() return SPARCCPU
>>>>>>>   sun4u: Store SPARCCPU in ResetData
>>>>>>>   leon3: Use cpu_sparc_init() to obtain SPARCCPU
>>>>>>>   leon3: Store SPARCCPU in ResetData
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> Forgot to mention the bsd-user patch.
>>>>
>>>>>>>   Kill off cpu_state_reset()
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ping! Blue, can you ack please?
>>>>>
>>>>> Otherwise the patches look pretty safe ("if it compiles, it works")=
.
>>
>> Was I supposed to interpret that as an Acked-by? ;)
>=20
> No, but you may do so if it compiles. ;-)

Joking, are we? My cover letter indicated pretty clearly on what
platforms I had already compile-tested on, and that meant each patch.
I had also run `make check` on each and the sparc test image for sun4m,
HelenOS for sun4u and "crible" for leon3.

Applied the remainder of the series to qom-next:
http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/afaerber.git/shortlog/refs/heads/qom-next

Tristan/Fabien, could you please submit a patch to document the Leon3
machine in MAINTAINERS? No one got cc'ed on those two patches. Thanks.

Andreas

--=20
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC=
rnberg