From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35328) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWlUN-0004nv-Qx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2012 05:34:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWlUM-0003Kg-2W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2012 05:34:47 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:4599) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWlUL-0003KP-Qg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2012 05:34:45 -0400 Message-ID: <4FBB5DAA.3@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 11:34:34 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1337087078-24056-1-git-send-email-jim@meyering.net> <1337087078-24056-2-git-send-email-jim@meyering.net> <87wr45n84r.fsf@rho.meyering.net> <4FBB4CEE.8040103@redhat.com> <87hav8k2ks.fsf@rho.meyering.net> In-Reply-To: <87hav8k2ks.fsf@rho.meyering.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] envlist.c: handle strdup failure List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jim Meyering Cc: Blue Swirl , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 22.05.2012 11:05, schrieb Jim Meyering: > Kevin Wolf wrote: >> A patch replacing tabs by spaces isn't really the kind of patches that >> we would want to avoid during freeze. It's easy enough to check with git >> diff -w that it doesn't change anything semantically. > > That makes sense, so I've posted two patches: > > 1) two patches: one replacing all leading TABs with equivalent spaces, > then the above patch > > Note however, that envlist.c must predate checkpatch.pl, since > that patch provokes numerous warnings about style issues: Quite possible. Most files in qemu will still contain some violations. > (hmm... I've just noticed these first two, which seem to suggest > that even for comments I should remove the TABs. Is it worth > a V2 to fix those two lines? Or are they false positives, since > they're not really "code" indentation? ) We don't use tabs at all where possible. There shouldn't be much more exceptions than the Makefiles. Kevin