Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-next 3/5] pc: move apic_mapped initialization into common apic init code

["Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>]

Am 22.05.2012 14:42, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
> On 05/22/2012 12:48 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-05-22 07:35, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>>> -        apic_mapped = 1;
>>> -    }
>>> -
>>> -    /* KVM does not support MSI yet. */
>>> -    if (!kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) {
>>> -        msi_supported = true;
>>> -    }
>>> -
>>> -    if (xen_msi_support()) {
>>> -        msi_supported = true;
>>> -    }
>>> -
>>> -    return dev;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>
>> You are loosing some xen bits here. But this will collide with latest
>> kvm pull request
>> (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/91171) anyway.
>> You may want to base on uq/master.
>>
> 
> This patchset is based on Andreas' qom-next tree. Probably I should wait
> till above mentioned kvm pull is pulled in and it aprears in qom-next.

Jan, we currently have a chaos of concurrent, colliding QOM series.
qom-next was intended to resolve this but so far it's a rebasing patch
queue on top of master and not a repository with stable hashes so I
can't do PULLs myself but I could cherry-pick related patches if needed.

Igor, if you put the code movement init -> initfn into its own patch
I'll apply it to qom-next right away. Haven't looked at the series
in-depth yet.

We're not quite there yet with qom-next due to series and counterseries
and lack of input on realize/QBus. My current merge plan is as follows:

* Apply QOM CPUState series part 3 (cpu_state_reset) - aggressively done
last night, prerequisite for part 4.

* Apply the last two remaining ARM cpu_reset followup cleanups - waiting
for one ack by PMM.

* Post QOM CPUState series part 4 (CPU_COMMON) - still fiddling with
bisectability, hope to post today. This will show areas of conflicts wrt
apic and x86 and is quite invasive (qom-cpu branch on GitHub).

* Mix and match patches from Paolo's and Anthony's series for realizefn.
Hope to post a short-term compromise soon, leaving properties aside for
now. Apply it so that we finally have a realizefn.

* Post QOM CPUState series part 5 (CPUState conditionally as device).
WIP (qom-cpu-dev branch on GitHub), needed for hotplug IIUC and this
will enable integration with machine reset. Doesn't depend on part 4 so far.

* Apply PMM's ARM copro series - waiting for acks, still need to
carefully review the final CPUID movements.
* Post realizefn implementation on top - probably to be merged after
PMM's holiday, i.e. to master not to qom-next.

* Align part 4 with Igor's series, possibly rebase on part 5. See how
close to 1.2 we get and how the review of all open series goes.

Whatever progress we make on qom-next, the idea is to have qom-next
merged into master *first*, since it's getting really large. Don't know
what KVM PULL Jan is referring to - if it's for 1.1 then I'll rebase on
it but otherwise I expect series to get rebased onto master w/qom-next
before sending a PULL. That's why I asked target maintainers to queue
the patches from my part 3 in their queues, to avoid merge conflicts
once the 1.2 window opens.

For the current QOM series I'm fine rebasing myself so far.

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg