qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: TeLeMan <geleman@gmail.com>
Cc: "Avi Kivity" <avi@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] exec: fix breakpoint_invalidate() breakage
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 23:21:12 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FBD9B18.70600@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FBD964C.4080401@web.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2560 bytes --]

On 2012-05-23 23:00, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-05-23 22:29, TeLeMan wrote:
>> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote:
>>> On 2012-05-23 13:02, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> On 2012-05-23 11:11, TeLeMan wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2012-05-23 04:09, TeLeMan wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Am 18.05.2012 11:49, schrieb TeLeMan:
>>>>>>>>> This breakage was introduced by the commit "memory: make
>>>>>>>>> phys_page_find() return an unadjusted".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You seem to have found the origin of your problem. If you also mention
>>>>>>>> the commit hash in your commit message then certain frontends (gitk,
>>>>>>>> repo.or.cz) will display it as a handy hyperlink to that commit.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: TeLeMan <geleman@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by is a legal statement of origin and must not be a pseudonym.
>>>>>>> Ok, please ignore this patch. I won't submit any patch just report bugs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then please describe this bug in more details, e.g. how to reproduce.
>>>>> I think its evident. cpu_get_phys_page_debug(env, pc) is not the
>>>>> physical address of pc but the physical page base address of pc.
>>>>
>>>> ...so this bites us if the instruction spans two pages as
>>>> tb_invalidate_phys_addr requests invalidation on a page granularity.
>>>
>>> In fact, this is irrelevant. We only need to flush the address at which
>>> the instruction starts, and that is achieved by flushing all TB that
>>> relate to that page as the current code does.
>>
>> But the instruction start is wrong and its TB may not be found. For example,
>> the pc is 0x1234 and its physical address is 0x1234. The correct
>> "start" and "end" of tb_invalidate_phys_page_range() is 0x1234 and
>> 0x1235. But now the "start" and "end" is 0x1000 and 0x1001.
>> If 0x1000 is not translated yet, the real TB won't be invalidated.
> 
> The tb containing 0x1234 would be linked to the list of TBs that are
> related to the 0x1000 page. As we declare that page invalid, all
> affected TBs are dropped, not just the one containing the breakpoint.
> See tb_invalidate_phys_page_range.

Oops, too fast: in fact the introductory comment of
tb_invalidate_phys_page_range is misleading, there is a sub-page-level
range check. And now my test also actually triggers. Was probably
running the wrong qemu version before.

Jan


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-24  2:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-18  9:49 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] exec: fix breakpoint_invalidate() breakage TeLeMan
2012-05-22 22:54 ` TeLeMan
2012-05-23  3:41 ` Andreas Färber
2012-05-23  7:09   ` TeLeMan
2012-05-23 11:22     ` Jan Kiszka
2012-05-23 14:11       ` TeLeMan
2012-05-23 16:02         ` Jan Kiszka
2012-05-23 17:36           ` Jan Kiszka
2012-05-24  1:29             ` TeLeMan
2012-05-24  2:00               ` Jan Kiszka
2012-05-24  2:16                 ` TeLeMan
2012-05-24  2:21                 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2012-05-23 19:40   ` Blue Swirl
2012-05-23 20:04     ` Andreas Färber
2012-05-23 20:28       ` Blue Swirl
2012-05-23 20:44         ` Anthony Liguori
2012-05-24  2:12           ` TeLeMan
2012-05-24 13:35             ` Andreas Färber
2012-05-24 18:12               ` Stefan Weil
2012-05-24 18:36                 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-05-24 19:42                   ` Stefan Weil
2012-05-24 19:51                     ` Anthony Liguori
2012-05-25  0:43                       ` TeLeMan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FBD9B18.70600@web.de \
    --to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=geleman@gmail.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).