From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Stefan Weinhuber <wein@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1 1/1] Fix geometry sector calculation
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 15:26:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FBE3712.5030302@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BA1CB0BB-95EE-4A39-B744-4C3D7EEBD6EC@suse.de>
On 24/05/12 15:06, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 24.05.2012, at 13:48, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Il 24/05/2012 13:22, Christian Borntraeger ha scritto:
>>> Currently the sector value for the geometry is masked, even if the
>>> user usesa command line parameter that explicitely gives a number.
>>> This breaks dasd devices on s390. A dasd device can have
>>> a physical block size of 4096 (== same for logical block size)
>>> and a typcial geometry of 15 heads and 12 sectors per cyl.
>>> The ibm partition detection relies on a correct geometry
>>> reported by the device. Unfortunately the current code changes
>>> 12 to 8. This would be necessary if the total size is
>>> not a multiple of logical sector size, but for dasd this
>>> is not the case.
>>>
>>> This patch checks the device size and only applies sector
>>> mask if necessary.
>>
>> Rereading the code, I have no idea what the masking is for. Perhaps we
>> can even remove it. However, your patch makes sense, it is safe, and it
>> would be nice to apply it even for 1.1.
>
> I also don't understand why this code is in virtio-blk.c. What does block geometry adjustment have to do with virtio?
Indeed,my first version of the patch was just
- blkcfg.sectors = secs & ~s->sector_mask;
+ blkcfg.sectors = secs;
But then I read the commit message of this line, and the idea seems to be that
a given geometry should be able to cover the full capacity of a disk (no half filled
cylinders)
>From an s390 perspective all cases are fine and I would just remove the masking.
I was just trying to keep the behaviour.
Christian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-24 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1337858575-37612-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
2012-05-24 11:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] Fix geometry sector calculation Christian Borntraeger
2012-05-24 11:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1 " Paolo Bonzini
2012-05-24 13:06 ` Alexander Graf
2012-05-24 13:26 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2012-05-25 11:53 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FBE3712.5030302@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wein@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).