From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55189)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1SXope-0007Ar-H0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 03:21:10 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1SXopW-0000UJ-TR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 03:21:06 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33401)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1SXopW-0000SE-MC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 03:20:58 -0400
Message-ID: <4FBF32C7.1000208@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 09:20:39 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1337787881-3579-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<1337787881-3579-3-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<4FBEA960.2080409@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <4FBEA960.2080409@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/10] qdev: remove qdev_prop_exists
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: imammedo@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org

Il 24/05/2012 23:34, Andreas F=C3=A4rber ha scritto:
>> > =20
>> > -static ObjectProperty *object_property_find(Object *obj, const char=
 *name)
>> > +ObjectProperty *object_property_find(Object *obj, const char *name)
>> >  {
>> >      ObjectProperty *prop;
>> > =20
> Any reason not to expose a bool object_property_exists() instead?

It seemed pretty redundant...

Paolo