From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60056)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas.faerber@web.de>) id 1SZ0Qk-0004xN-2t
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2012 09:56:23 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas.faerber@web.de>) id 1SZ0Qe-0001YL-UX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2012 09:56:17 -0400
Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:61574)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas.faerber@web.de>) id 1SZ0Qe-0001WQ-Lg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2012 09:56:12 -0400
Message-ID: <4FC383F3.2020509@web.de>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 15:56:03 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= <andreas.faerber@web.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1335974850-30180-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
	<1335974850-30180-6-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
	<4FC233F5.60006@web.de> <4FC31CC1.6080805@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FC31CC1.6080805@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu 5/6] implement -no-user-config
 command-line option (v3)
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>, libvir-list@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>, Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>, Erik Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>

Am 28.05.2012 08:35, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 27/05/2012 16:02, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
>> Any suggestion how to fix?

Sorry, I forgot to reply here that I've sent a patch.

> Does it work to "typedef _Bool __bool" before including altivec.h (and
> in the same #ifdef)?

Haven't tried but I'm afraid of what side effects that may have...
I feel more comfortable sticking to the POSIX #define bool _Bool rule.

Andreas