From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35641) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SbpC6-0008D4-W7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 04:32:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SbpC0-0000E2-Nz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 04:32:50 -0400 Received: from david.siemens.de ([192.35.17.14]:24754) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SbpC0-0000Dq-EX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 04:32:44 -0400 Message-ID: <4FCDC425.4010609@siemens.com> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 10:32:37 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1337618267-16669-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <4FCC4BA8.7050900@codemonkey.ws> <4FCD585B.9020105@suse.de> <4FCD67AA.7070204@codemonkey.ws> <4FCDB86B.6030802@redhat.com> <74F64445-779D-4F48-B043-0AB8F2E55B26@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <74F64445-779D-4F48-B043-0AB8F2E55B26@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/20 1.2] kvm updates List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , Marcelo Tosatti , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org" , Avi Kivity , Anthony Liguori , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= On 2012-06-05 10:10, Alexander Graf wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 05.06.2012, at 09:42, Avi Kivity wrote: >=20 >> On 06/05/2012 04:58 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> On 06/05/2012 08:52 AM, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: >>>> Am 04.06.2012 07:46, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >>>>> On 05/22/2012 12:37 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: >>>>>> Please pull from: >>>>>> >>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/qemu-kvm.git uq/master >>>>> >>>>> Pulled. Thanks. >>>> >>>> This broke the ppc build. Guys, why wasn't this tested? There's only >>>> three KVM targets to test compared to the 14 I'm struggling with... >>> >>> Is build bot running against uq/master? If it's not, maybe we should >>> add it to build bot to catch this sort of thing. >> >> A build bot is overkill. I usually do a full build (and autotest), >> don't know how this was missed. >=20 > Not sure why it would be overkill. We have build bots running on more e= xotic hw (ppc and s390) with kvm available for that exact purpose. They'r= e running either way - all we need to do is enable uq/master and we catch= these before the next pull request :). I think this makes some sense. uq/master is supposed to be the staging branch for generic and (at least) x86 kvm changes in QEMU. So it should cover at least their builds. Jan --=20 Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux