From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33840)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1SbtUA-0006OU-71
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 09:07:53 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1SbtU3-00041E-49
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 09:07:45 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60904)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1SbtU2-000412-SH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 09:07:39 -0400
Message-ID: <4FCE0495.7010505@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 16:07:33 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4FC9E280.2030409@codemonkey.ws> <4FCB9977.60504@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <4FCB9977.60504@web.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] The development tree is now open!
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>

On 06/03/2012 08:05 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-06-02 11:53, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Let your PATCHes, PULLs, RFCs, and RFTs start flowing.  I'll start
>> applying pull requests on Monday or perhaps earlier if I can find the time.
>> 
>> For submaintainers, if you have a very large queue (> 50 patches),
>> please split your pulls into multiple pull requests of reasonable size
>> (~50) and submit them spaced out a week at a time.  If you have a lot of
>> safe/trivial patches, of course use your best judgement.
> 
> Would be great if [1] could be merged quickly as quite some work on
> qemu-kvm depends on its back-merge.
> 
> Hopefully, we will be able to finally close the feature gap between
> qemu-kvm and upstream with 1.2.
> 

Note, I am holding off on the qemu-kvm-1.1 release pending investigation
of the qcow2/ide bug that Yongjie Ren discovered.  But if it's holding
you off, I can branch 1.1 now and merge this early to master.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function