From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47310) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sbtg2-0001iC-WB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 09:20:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sbtfs-0006pA-Vh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 09:20:02 -0400 Received: from goliath.siemens.de ([192.35.17.28]:17241) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sbtfs-0006ol-Ll for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 09:19:52 -0400 Message-ID: <4FCE0772.7010302@siemens.com> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 15:19:46 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4FC9E280.2030409@codemonkey.ws> <4FCB9977.60504@web.de> <4FCE0495.7010505@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4FCE0495.7010505@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] The development tree is now open! List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , qemu-devel , Anthony Liguori On 2012-06-05 15:07, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 06/03/2012 08:05 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2012-06-02 11:53, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> Let your PATCHes, PULLs, RFCs, and RFTs start flowing. I'll start >>> applying pull requests on Monday or perhaps earlier if I can find the time. >>> >>> For submaintainers, if you have a very large queue (> 50 patches), >>> please split your pulls into multiple pull requests of reasonable size >>> (~50) and submit them spaced out a week at a time. If you have a lot of >>> safe/trivial patches, of course use your best judgement. >> >> Would be great if [1] could be merged quickly as quite some work on >> qemu-kvm depends on its back-merge. >> >> Hopefully, we will be able to finally close the feature gap between >> qemu-kvm and upstream with 1.2. >> > > Note, I am holding off on the qemu-kvm-1.1 release pending investigation > of the qcow2/ide bug that Yongjie Ren discovered. But if it's holding > you off, I can branch 1.1 now and merge this early to master. I'm optimistic that the pull I sent yesterday should still merge cleanly into a master that contains some qcow2 or whatever fix. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux