From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47116)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aliguori@us.ibm.com>) id 1ScE5A-0007cv-5A
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 07:07:21 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aliguori@us.ibm.com>) id 1ScE58-0005kR-9Q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 07:07:19 -0400
Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.142]:37979)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aliguori@us.ibm.com>) id 1ScE58-0005jJ-5J
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 07:07:18 -0400
Received: from /spool/local
	by e2.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only!
	Violators will be prosecuted
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org> from <aliguori@us.ibm.com>;
	Wed, 6 Jun 2012 07:07:12 -0400
Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234])
	by d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ECA538C8026
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed,  6 Jun 2012 07:06:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64])
	by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id
	q56B6aj9160960
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 07:06:36 -0400
Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id
	q56B6ZQr031190
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 07:06:36 -0400
Message-ID: <4FCF39B5.4050504@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 19:06:29 +0800
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20120604233318.4C32E40771@buildbot.b1-systems.de>
	<4FCD58B7.9080802@suse.de> <4FCDB5D8.60701@web.de>
	<4FCE581D.8020309@siemens.com> <4FCF17CC.90601@redhat.com>
	<4FCF3165.6040409@siemens.com> <4FCF34A0.6030101@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FCF34A0.6030101@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] kvm: Fix build for non-CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
	targets
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, "agraf@suse.de" <agraf@suse.de>, Ben Collins <bcollins@ubuntu.com>, =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 06/06/2012 06:44 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/06/2012 01:31 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-06-06 10:41, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 06/05/2012 10:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> A type definition and a KVMState field initialization escaped the
>>>> required wrapping with KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING. Also, we need to provide a
>>>> dummy kvm_irqchip_release_virq as virtio-pci references (but does not
>>>> use) it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks, applied.
>>
>> Please send a pull soon.
>
> It was posted already, I just forgot to copy you.

It's being tested as we type too.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
>