From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50446) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ScFBH-00089l-2U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 08:17:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ScFBC-00041C-A4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 08:17:42 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com ([209.85.210.45]:34608) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ScFBC-000415-3o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 08:17:38 -0400 Received: by dadv2 with SMTP id v2so9453927dad.4 for ; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 05:17:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FCF4A59.2060100@codemonkey.ws> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 20:17:29 +0800 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1338875386-21051-1-git-send-email-yhalperi@redhat.com> <4FCDF49E.6090006@codemonkey.ws> <4FCE067E.5030903@redhat.com> <4FCF1E70.3030703@redhat.com> <4FCF214D.8060001@codemonkey.ws> <4FCF46B0.1010905@redhat.com> <4FCF4848.9010005@codemonkey.ws> <20120606121516.GI16572@garlic.tlv.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20120606121516.GI16572@garlic.tlv.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/5] asynchronous migration state change handlers List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Yonit Halperin , aliguori@us.ibm.com, Gerd Hoffmann , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 06/06/2012 08:15 PM, Alon Levy wrote: > On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 08:08:40PM +0800, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> On 06/06/2012 08:01 PM, Yonit Halperin wrote: >>> On 06/06/2012 12:22 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>>> >>>> So send a QMP event and call it a day. >>>> >>> Using a QMP event is making spice seamless migration dependent on libvirt >>> version. >> >> That is not an acceptable justification. > > To let spice know that libvirt doesn't support the new event would > require libvirt capabilities advertisement to qemu. Is that acceptable? I literally have danpb's event introspection patches from Luiz's PULL request testing on my system right now to be pushed. So this is already a solved problem. Regards, Anthony Liguori