From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44373) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Scc87-00022d-42 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 08:48:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Scc85-0004g2-2o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 08:47:58 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:61400) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Scc84-0004fh-Sq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 08:47:56 -0400 Received: by pbbro12 with SMTP id ro12so1131398pbb.4 for ; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 05:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FD0A2F5.70504@codemonkey.ws> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 20:47:49 +0800 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1339054814-20939-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <4FD09F16.5010007@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <4FD09F16.5010007@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v3 00/29] per-directory Makefile.objs snippets, limit vpath (ab)use List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 06/07/2012 08:31 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 07.06.2012 09:39, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: >> The following changes since commit 349417004a0f7cf5518a998dca755cd06f6c212b: >> >> Merge remote-tracking branch 'qmp/queue/qmp' into staging (2012-06-06 20:57:56 +0800) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> >> git://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git nested-makefiles-3 >> >> for you to fetch changes up to 2dee8d54c62abb0a46578ad21cc25782b83e3773: >> >> build: do not create directories at configure time (2012-06-07 09:21:20 +0200) >> >> Wen, please give a look at patches 7-9. I think they are not controversial, >> but an Acked-by would be nice. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Paolo >> >> v2->v3: included patch from Anthony, added fixes for new dump mechanism > > A question: How nice does this play with `make clean`ing the old places > the objects were built in an existing checkout? Did you test that? I did. Seemed to work for me but YMMV. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > Andreas >