From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55210)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1Scm0j-0001Bc-2g
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 19:21:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1Scm0h-0002Nt-3p
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 19:21:00 -0400
Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com ([209.85.210.45]:54286)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1Scm0g-0002Mi-Qc
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 19:20:59 -0400
Received: by dadv2 with SMTP id v2so1696747dad.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 16:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4FD13754.4080003@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 01:20:52 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4FD0EA80.1000302@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
In-Reply-To: <4FD0EA80.1000302@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL] iov* function rework (one more time)
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Il 07/06/2012 19:53, Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
> 
> This is the same patchset which has been submitted, resubmitted,
> rewritten, resubmitted, split, resubmitted, merged, rewritten again,
> resubmitted and finally received a promise from Anthony to be looked
> at.  Today, months later, I'm still awaiiting for the answer, and,
> while I said before that the last resubmission was, well, last,
> since I bothered so many people so many times, I decided to break
> my promise, rebase against current qemy/master and resend it,
> now as a git pull request, to not mailbomb people again.  The rebase
> took quite some work again, since the code changed (obviously) since
> the patchset was ready before.  During rebase I reviewed all the
> commit messages too, and removed all the Cc lines they had.

I'll review the patches and hopefully send my Reviewed-by, since I
actually liked the idea.  But I'm travelling so I will only be able to
send the email on Monday.

Paolo