From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57432) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sd28C-0003wp-UX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:33:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sd288-0000sy-EW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:33:48 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:57232) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sd288-0000sj-5U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:33:44 -0400 Message-ID: <4FD22966.7020307@rdsoftware.de> Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:33:42 +0200 From: Erik Rull MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] USB Hostport Differences List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Cc: Gerd Hoffmann Hi all, when assigning USB host devices to a guest using the hostport option, there seem to be different formats, when calling info usbhost: - On my vanilla kernel linux there is a hostport format e.g. "1.5" or "1.2" - On my Debian 6.0 full blown linux there is a hostport format "2" or "4", that means, there are no dots and only one number Where do the differences come from? I'm working on some scripts that give some dynamic qemu command line options related to the hostport - maybe there is a way of getting them to the same format? Best regards, Erik