From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51314) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdkPR-0000qV-Ij for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:50:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdkPP-0004NN-V5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:50:33 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f173.google.com ([74.125.82.173]:49434) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdkPP-0004N1-Ma for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:50:31 -0400 Received: by werf3 with SMTP id f3so1842602wer.4 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 08:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4FD4C242.7070907@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:50:26 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4FD0EA80.1000302@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4FD13754.4080003@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4FD13754.4080003@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL] iov* function rework (one more time) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Anthony Liguori , Michael Tokarev , qemu-devel Il 08/06/2012 01:20, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto: >> > This is the same patchset which has been submitted, resubmitted, >> > rewritten, resubmitted, split, resubmitted, merged, rewritten again, >> > resubmitted and finally received a promise from Anthony to be looked >> > at. Today, months later, I'm still awaiiting for the answer, and, >> > while I said before that the last resubmission was, well, last, >> > since I bothered so many people so many times, I decided to break >> > my promise, rebase against current qemy/master and resend it, >> > now as a git pull request, to not mailbomb people again. The rebase >> > took quite some work again, since the code changed (obviously) since >> > the patchset was ready before. During rebase I reviewed all the >> > commit messages too, and removed all the Cc lines they had. > I'll review the patches and hopefully send my Reviewed-by, since I > actually liked the idea. But I'm travelling so I will only be able to > send the email on Monday. Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini One day in advance ;) Paolo