qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-next 1/7] qdev: Push state up to Object
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:35:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD4DAE9.9060803@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FD4C1F3.2010203@redhat.com>

On 06/10/2012 10:49 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 08/06/2012 03:19, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>>>
>>> +typedef enum ObjectState {
>>> +    OBJECT_STATE_INITIALIZED = 1,
>>> +    OBJECT_STATE_REALIZED,
>>> +} ObjectState;
>>
>> I think using a bool would be better since it reduces the temptation to
>> add additional states.
>
> In fact someone already discussed having a third state for block
> devices... :)

This is *exactly* why bool is better.  Because too many people will be tempted 
to add stuff that doesn't belong in Object.

A classic problem with OO design is bloating base classes--especially when you 
have one common base class.

Everything in Object must be relevant to all subclasses, not just some.  Having 
an OBJECT_STATE_OPENED only makes sense for BlockDevices.  Therefore the concept 
of opened should live in the BlockDevice parent class.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-10 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-07 19:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-next 0/7] QOM realize, revised Andreas Färber
2012-06-07 19:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-next 1/7] qdev: Push state up to Object Andreas Färber
2012-06-08  1:19   ` Anthony Liguori
2012-06-10 15:49     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-06-10 17:35       ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2012-06-10 17:38       ` Andreas Färber
2012-06-11  8:25         ` Kevin Wolf
2012-06-11 13:21           ` Anthony Liguori
2012-06-11 14:38             ` Kevin Wolf
2012-06-11 21:31             ` Andreas Färber
2012-06-11 21:43               ` Andreas Färber
2012-06-11 21:48               ` Anthony Liguori
2012-06-12  0:14                 ` Andreas Färber
2012-06-07 19:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-next 2/7] qom: Add get_id Andreas Färber
2012-06-08  1:22   ` Anthony Liguori
2012-06-08  7:11     ` Andreas Färber
2012-06-08  7:44       ` Anthony Liguori
2012-06-08  8:17         ` Andreas Färber
2012-06-08 10:59           ` [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] " Daniel P. Berrange
2012-06-08 11:58         ` [Qemu-devel] " Eric Blake
2012-06-07 19:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-next 3/7] qdev: Generalize properties to Objects Andreas Färber
2012-06-08  1:23   ` Anthony Liguori
2012-06-07 19:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-next 4/7] qdev: Move bulk of qdev-properties.c to qom/object-properties.c Andreas Färber
2012-06-07 23:23   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-06-08  1:26   ` Anthony Liguori
2012-06-07 19:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-next 5/7] qom: Push static properties to Object Andreas Färber
2012-06-08  1:26   ` Anthony Liguori
2012-06-07 19:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-next 6/7] qom: Add "realized" property Andreas Färber
2012-06-08  1:26   ` Anthony Liguori
2012-06-07 19:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-next 7/7] qom: Add QERR_PROPERTY_SET_AFTER_REALIZE Andreas Färber
2012-06-07 19:56   ` Andreas Färber
2012-06-07 23:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-next 0/7] QOM realize, revised Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FD4DAE9.9060803@codemonkey.ws \
    --to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).