From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Se1cD-0006tr-8z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:12:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Se1cB-0005HE-F1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:12:52 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:49680) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Se1cB-0005Gu-5Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:12:51 -0400 Message-ID: <4FD5C49F.60804@web.de> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:12:47 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4FC502CE.20509@weilnetz.de> <4FC53AAD.3010201@redhat.com> <4FC5888D.5080902@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1?] qemu_rearm_alarm_timer: do not call rearm if the next deadline is INT64_MAX List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: Paolo Bonzini , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Anthony Liguori , Stefan Weil Am 11.06.2012 11:55, schrieb Stefano Stabellini: > On Wed, 30 May 2012, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>>> Reviewed-by: Stefan Weil >>>> >>>> This patch clearly improves the current code and fixes >>>> an abort on Darwin (reported by Andreas Färber) and maybe >>>> other hosts. Therefore I changed the subject and suggest >>>> to consider this patch for QEMU 1.1. >> >> Not for 1.1.0. I'm just a few hours away from pushing the 1.1.0-rc4 tag and I >> don't plan on doing any updates before GA unless something critical emerges. > > Anthony, > are you going to pick this one up for 1.1.1? Do you need me to do > anything? I think I still need to test this one... thanks for the reminder. ;) Andreas