qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Jens Freimann <jfrei@de.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
	Jens Freimann <jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Heinz Graalfs <graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/8] s390: autodetect map private
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:20:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD725EB.7050501@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FD70CC0.7000901@suse.de>

> Is there any way we can move the above code to target-s390x? Having the
> branch below is already invasive enough for generic code, but we really
> don't need all the special s390 quirks to live here.


Hmm, we have to have a special hook somehow.
What about this approach?

-----------------------

By default qemu will use MAP_PRIVATE for guest pages. This will write
protect pages and thus break on s390 systems that dont support this feature.
Therefore qemu has a hack to always use MAP_SHARED for s390. But MAP_SHARED
has other problems (no dirty pages tracking, a lot more swap overhead etc.)
Newer systems allow the distinction via KVM_CAP_S390_COW. With this feature
qemu can use the standard qemu alloc if available, otherwise it will use
the old s390 hack.

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
 exec.c             |   19 ++++---------------
 kvm.h              |    1 +
 oslib-posix.c      |    3 +++
 target-s390x/kvm.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
index a587e7a..9b9b8e1 100644
--- a/exec.c
+++ b/exec.c
@@ -2645,26 +2645,15 @@ ram_addr_t qemu_ram_alloc_from_ptr(ram_addr_t size, void *host,
             exit(1);
 #endif
         } else {
-#if defined(TARGET_S390X) && defined(CONFIG_KVM)
-            /* S390 KVM requires the topmost vma of the RAM to be smaller than
-               an system defined value, which is at least 256GB. Larger systems
-               have larger values. We put the guest between the end of data
-               segment (system break) and this value. We use 32GB as a base to
-               have enough room for the system break to grow. */
-            new_block->host = mmap((void*)0x800000000, size,
-                                   PROT_EXEC|PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
-                                   MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_FIXED, -1, 0);
-            if (new_block->host == MAP_FAILED) {
-                fprintf(stderr, "Allocating RAM failed\n");
-                abort();
-            }
-#else
             if (xen_enabled()) {
                 xen_ram_alloc(new_block->offset, size, mr);
+#if defined(TARGET_S390X)
+            } else if (kvm_enabled()) {
+                new_block->host = kvm_arch_alloc(size);
+#endif
             } else {
                 new_block->host = qemu_vmalloc(size);
             }
-#endif
             qemu_madvise(new_block->host, size, QEMU_MADV_MERGEABLE);
         }
     }
diff --git a/kvm.h b/kvm.h
index 9c7b0ea..9d50016 100644
--- a/kvm.h
+++ b/kvm.h
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ int kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPUArchState *env, int type, ...);
 
 extern const KVMCapabilityInfo kvm_arch_required_capabilities[];
 
+void *kvm_arch_alloc(ram_addr_t size);
 void kvm_arch_pre_run(CPUArchState *env, struct kvm_run *run);
 void kvm_arch_post_run(CPUArchState *env, struct kvm_run *run);
 
diff --git a/oslib-posix.c b/oslib-posix.c
index b6a3c7f..93902ac 100644
--- a/oslib-posix.c
+++ b/oslib-posix.c
@@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ extern int daemon(int, int);
       therefore we need special code which handles running on Valgrind. */
 #  define QEMU_VMALLOC_ALIGN (512 * 4096)
 #  define CONFIG_VALGRIND
+#elif defined(__linux__) && defined(__s390x__)
+   /* Use 1 MiB (segment size) alignment so gmap can be used by KVM. */
+#  define QEMU_VMALLOC_ALIGN (256 * 4096)
 #else
 #  define QEMU_VMALLOC_ALIGN getpagesize()
 #endif
diff --git a/target-s390x/kvm.c b/target-s390x/kvm.c
index 90aad61..ccf5daa 100644
--- a/target-s390x/kvm.c
+++ b/target-s390x/kvm.c
@@ -135,6 +135,40 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUS390XState *env)
     return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Legacy layout for s390:
+ * Older S390 KVM requires the topmost vma of the RAM to be
+ * smaller than an system defined value, which is at least 256GB.
+ * Larger systems have larger values. We put the guest between
+ * the end of data segment (system break) and this value. We
+ * use 32GB as a base to have enough room for the system break
+ * to grow. We also have to use MAP parameters that avoid
+ * read-only mapping of guest pages.
+ */
+static void *legacy_s390_alloc(ram_addr_t size)
+{
+    void *mem;
+
+    mem = mmap((void *) 0x800000000ULL, size,
+               PROT_EXEC|PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
+               MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_FIXED, -1, 0);
+    if (mem == MAP_FAILED) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "Allocating RAM failed\n");
+        abort();
+    }
+    return mem;
+}
+
+void *kvm_arch_alloc(ram_addr_t size)
+{
+    if (kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_S390_GMAP) &&
+        kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_S390_COW)) {
+        return qemu_vmalloc(size);
+    } else {
+        return legacy_s390_alloc(size);
+    }
+}
+
 int kvm_arch_insert_sw_breakpoint(CPUS390XState *env, struct kvm_sw_breakpoint *bp)
 {
     static const uint8_t diag_501[] = {0x83, 0x24, 0x05, 0x01};

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-12 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-06 12:05 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] s390: SCLP console and misc Jens Freimann
2012-06-06 12:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/8] s390: add new define for KVM_CAP_S390_COW Jens Freimann
2012-06-06 12:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/8] s390: autodetect map private Jens Freimann
2012-06-12  9:32   ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-12 11:20     ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2012-06-12 11:57       ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-12 12:02         ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-06-12 12:12           ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-13 10:30             ` Jan Kiszka
2012-06-13 10:54               ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-13 10:58                 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-06-13 11:27                   ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-06-13 11:41                     ` Jan Kiszka
2012-06-13 12:33                       ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-13 12:35                         ` Jan Kiszka
2012-06-15 14:01                           ` [Qemu-devel] Next version of memory allocation fixup Christian Borntraeger
2012-06-15 14:01                             ` [Qemu-devel] [PatchV2] s390: autodetect map private Christian Borntraeger
2012-06-15 15:10                             ` [Qemu-devel] One more fix Christian Borntraeger
2012-06-15 15:10                               ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] s390: autodetect map private Christian Borntraeger
2012-06-15 17:01                                 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-06-18 13:44                                 ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-06 12:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/8] s390: make kvm_stat work on s390 Jens Freimann
2012-06-06 12:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/8] s390: stop target cpu on sigp initial reset Jens Freimann
2012-06-12  9:42   ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-12 10:15     ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-06-06 12:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/8] s390: Cleanup sclp functions Jens Freimann
2012-06-12  9:58   ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-12 10:07     ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-06-12 10:09       ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-12 10:10       ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-12 12:24     ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-06-12 12:32       ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-12 22:41         ` Anthony Liguori
2012-06-12 22:38   ` Anthony Liguori
2012-06-06 12:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/8] s390: sclp event facility and signal quiesce support via system_powerdown Jens Freimann
2012-06-12 11:38   ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-13  7:00     ` Heinz Graalfs
2012-06-13 13:12       ` Andreas Färber
2012-06-06 12:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/8] s390: Add SCLP vt220 console support Jens Freimann
2012-06-12 11:52   ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-13  7:27     ` Heinz Graalfs
2012-06-13  7:53       ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-06 12:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/8] s390: Fix the storage increment size calculation Jens Freimann
2012-06-12 11:53   ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-12 14:57     ` Jeng-fang Wang
2012-06-18 13:46       ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-18 19:30         ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-06-18 12:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] s390: SCLP console and misc Christian Borntraeger
2012-06-18 13:33   ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-18 13:41     ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-06-18 13:51       ` Alexander Graf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FD725EB.7050501@de.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jfrei@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).