From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35578) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Semaj-00061A-7m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:22:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Semac-0008CC-0o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:22:28 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:45781 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Semab-0008Bu-Qg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:22:21 -0400 Message-ID: <4FD885F4.1060201@suse.de> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:22:12 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1339513523-1699-1-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com> <1339513523-1699-6-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com> <20120612151557.GA10691@redhat.com> <4FD8764B.9060003@siemens.com> <4FD880D3.8090203@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <4FD880D3.8090203@siemens.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V12 5/9] Revert "pci: don't export an internal function" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Anthony Liguori , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Stefano Stabellini , QEMU-devel , Xen Devel , Anthony Perard , Paolo Bonzini Am 13.06.2012 14:00, schrieb Jan Kiszka: > On 2012-06-13 13:22, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> We should really consolidate over one parser for Xen, KVM device >>> assignment and VFIO. It looks like they all have very similar require= ments. >>> >>> For those how didn't follow the discussion, see patches 10-13 in >>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/153728. >> >> I agree, actually it looks like patch 10 and 11 would be enough. >> >> Maybe you could extract them and send them out separately? >=20 > They are still under discussion and waiting for some QOM refactorings t= o > be merged. The first qom-next PULL is already merged into qemu.git (you should've been cc'ed) and I'm actually waiting for you to rebase and send out a v2 and/or to let me know what your/mst's merge time frame is so that we can coordinate the next PULLs. Currently the semantics discussion looks like we won't merge Paolo's qdev-properties.c movement, so the preview I posted is all that one of us will have to rebase (on). Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe= rg