From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52381) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Semsu-0005P3-JN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:41:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Semsp-0004S0-Cw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:41:16 -0400 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:1277) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Semsp-0004RY-2b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:41:11 -0400 Message-ID: <4FD88A33.1080304@citrix.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:40:19 +0100 From: Anthony PERARD MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1339513523-1699-1-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com> <1339513523-1699-6-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com> <20120612151557.GA10691@redhat.com> <4FD8764B.9060003@siemens.com> <4FD880D3.8090203@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <4FD880D3.8090203@siemens.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V12 5/9] Revert "pci: don't export an internal function" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Anthony Liguori , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Xen Devel , QEMU-devel , Stefano Stabellini On 13/06/12 13:00, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-06-13 13:22, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> On 2012-06-12 17:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 04:05:19PM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote: >>>>> This reverts commit 94a09e2c846374a96719cda2b4e1312d8c4b08a7. >>>>> >>>>> This function is used by a later patch to parse the BDF of the device to >>>>> passthrough. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD >>>> >>>> You probably want to parse the host address? You don't want to copy the >>>> bugs in pci_parse_devaddr - write your own that has sane semantics >>>> for host. E.g. you need to support ARI etc. >>> >>> We should really consolidate over one parser for Xen, KVM device >>> assignment and VFIO. It looks like they all have very similar requirements. >>> >>> For those how didn't follow the discussion, see patches 10-13 in >>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/153728. >> >> I agree, actually it looks like patch 10 and 11 would be enough. >> >> Maybe you could extract them and send them out separately? > > They are still under discussion and waiting for some QOM refactorings to > be merged. > > Will you be able to use an address parser via some device property? Yes. Actually, the address is already a device property. -- Anthony PERARD