From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] make: automatically include dependencies in recursive subdir rules (v2)
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 07:47:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FDF2346.9060504@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FDEF152.2070303@siemens.com>
On 06/18/2012 04:13 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-06-18 02:32, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 18.06.2012 02:01, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>> This will work technically but I still feel this is wrong semantically.
>> The pre-Paolo and current way is picking specific files from the hw/kvm/
>> directory. Your change above implies that in hw/kvm/ only x86 files can
>> live, which I dislike. As suggested before, I would prefer if x86-only
>> files were moved to an x86-specific location - the place for that
>> existing since Paolo's refactoring would be hw/i386/. CC'ing Jan. That
>> would match Paolo's reply in the unicore32 thread on future file
>> placement. Alternatives would be hw/i386/kvm/ or hw/kvm/i386/; we're
>> talking about a handful of files only though, so I don't think they
>> require a new subdirectory.
>
> Some per-arch separation is required, at least in the build process.
> We'll see power and arm stubs for in-kernel devices soon.
i8259.o i8254.o ioapic.o don't need to be arch specific
apic.o ought to be renamed to lapic.o and moved to target-i386/kvm/
I think clock.o also more than likely belongs in target-i386/kvm/. It would
have to be implemented as part of the CPU core if it ever existed IRL.
In general, if is logically part of a CPU core, it ought to be in
target-$(ARCH). Otherwise, it shouldn't be built as a target specific object.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> Jan
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-18 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-18 0:01 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] make: automatically include dependencies in recursive subdir rules (v2) Anthony Liguori
2012-06-18 0:32 ` Andreas Färber
2012-06-18 9:13 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-06-18 9:31 ` Peter Maydell
2012-06-18 10:42 ` Andreas Färber
2012-06-18 10:56 ` Peter Maydell
2012-06-18 11:35 ` Andreas Färber
2012-06-18 11:45 ` Peter Maydell
2012-06-18 12:47 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2012-06-18 13:08 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-06-20 13:06 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FDF2346.9060504@us.ibm.com \
--to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).