From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@petalogix.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>,
"Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
John Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] SSI QOMification
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:55:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE319C9.7020201@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEgOgz6VrMvSH8tuxVuX00=UPPYKDqkLNHKhPxE7vTHsomfYqg@mail.gmail.com>
Am 21.06.2012 02:21, schrieb Peter Crosthwaite:
> Ping!
>
> Id really appreciate some input on this issue (rather than going ahead
> and doing it to discover that someone disagrees with the approach).
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Peter Crosthwaite
> <peter.crosthwaite@petalogix.com> wrote:
>> So here are the nitty-gritty details around the pending QOM stuff:
>>
>> Anthony is currently overhauling QBus, and im guessing the SSI bus is
>> part of that? qom-next stable enough in this area to look at or not?
qom-next has been fully merged into qemu.git now, so please do not base
any work on the stale branch.
>> Also Anthony mentioned recently some GPIO refactoring stuff
Guess you're referring to the "Pin" series. That was waiting on the QBus
merge. Now it's probably been held up by the various Makefile fires. ;)
Andreas
>> - Are
>> GPIOs on multiple levels of abstraction supported yet? IE if I have a
>> SPI GPIO device, I need a GPIO on the SSISlave layer but also GPIOs on
>> my (concrete) device layer. I know this currently doesnt work cos of
>> qdev but thats going away right?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Peter
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-21 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-18 5:13 [Qemu-devel] [RFC] SSI QOMification Peter Crosthwaite
2012-06-21 0:21 ` Peter Crosthwaite
2012-06-21 12:55 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FE319C9.7020201@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
--cc=john.williams@petalogix.com \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.crosthwaite@petalogix.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).