From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: Liu Ping Fan <pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: First step to push iothread lock out of inner run loop
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 17:31:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE724B6.8010607@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FE71F44.9020800@web.de>
On 06/24/2012 05:08 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-06-24 10:49, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 06/23/2012 02:45 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
>>> Hmm, we may need the iothread lock around cpu_set_apic_tpr for
>>> !kvm_irqchip_in_kernel(). And as we are at it, apic_base manipulation
>>> can be but there as well.
>>>
>>> With in-kernel irqchip, there is no such need. Also, no one accesses
>>> eflags outside of the vcpu thread, independent of the irqchip mode.
>>
>> In fact !kvm_irqchip_in_kernel() is broken wrt the tpr. Interrupt
>> injection needs to be done atomically, but currently we check the tpr
>> from the injecting thread, which means the cpu thread can race with it.
>> We need to move the check to the vcpu thread so that the guest vcpu is
>> halted.
>
> So apic_set_irq basically needs to be deferred to vcpu context, right?
> Will have a look.
Correct. IIRC, the kernel's 0a5fff192388d2 made the problem much worse,
but did not create it. It was either Vista or XP-64 which triggered the
problem reliably. Copying Gleb in case he remembers more.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-24 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-22 22:45 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: First step to push iothread lock out of inner run loop Jan Kiszka
2012-06-22 22:55 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-06-23 0:22 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-06-23 9:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-06-23 11:45 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-06-24 8:49 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-24 14:08 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-06-24 14:31 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-07-06 17:16 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-07-06 18:06 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-07-08 7:49 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-24 13:34 ` liu ping fan
2012-06-24 14:08 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-06-24 14:35 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-24 14:40 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-06-24 14:46 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-24 14:51 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-06-24 14:56 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-24 14:58 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-06-24 14:59 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-23 9:22 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-06-22 22:59 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-06-23 9:11 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FE724B6.8010607@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).