Re: [Qemu-devel] plan for device assignment upstream

[Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>]

On 07/02/2012 12:18 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I've been thinking hard about Jan's patches for device
> assignment. Basically while I thought it makes sense
> to make all devices: assignment and not - behave the
> same and use same APIs for injecting irqs, Anthony thinks there is huge
> value in making irq propagation hierarchical and device assignment
> should be special cased.
> 
> We seem to be at impasse for now and I think merging
> assignment ASAP has higher value than this specific
> issue. So I fold - let's do it as Anthony and Jan's
> original patches proposed.
> 
> Jan, can you please rebase and repost your original patchset (against
> master, not against pci) that added query for host irqs callbacks for
> device assignment? I'll re-review ignoring the idea of using the cache,
> with intent apply after I'll drop cache code from the pci branch in a
> couple of days (busy otherwise now).
> 
> I still intend to rework this later on, but that can wait.

Agree with both your ideas about the API and the decision to rework it
in tree.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function