[Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday, July 3rd

[Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday, July 3rd

[Juan Quintela]

Hi

Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.

Later, Juan.

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday, July 3rd

[Eric Blake]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 711 bytes --]

On 07/02/2012 04:16 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.

Can we discuss the future of 'getfd', the possibility of 'pass-fd', or
even the enhancement of all existing monitor commands to take an
optional 'nfds' JSON argument for atomic management of fd passing?
Which commands need to reopen a file with different access, and do we
bite the bullet to special case all of those commands to allow fd
passing or can we make qemu_open() coupled with high-level fd passing
generic enough to satisfy all of our reopen needs?

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake@redhat.com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org




[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 620 bytes --]

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday, July 3rd

[Kevin Wolf]

Am 02.07.2012 19:33, schrieb Eric Blake:
> On 07/02/2012 04:16 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> 
> Can we discuss the future of 'getfd', the possibility of 'pass-fd', or
> even the enhancement of all existing monitor commands to take an
> optional 'nfds' JSON argument for atomic management of fd passing?
> Which commands need to reopen a file with different access, and do we
> bite the bullet to special case all of those commands to allow fd
> passing or can we make qemu_open() coupled with high-level fd passing
> generic enough to satisfy all of our reopen needs?

Sure we can, at least if Corey will attend the call. Otherwise I guess
it's better to keep the discussion on the mailing list.

Kevin

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday, July 3rd

[Corey Bryant]

On 07/03/2012 08:33 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 02.07.2012 19:33, schrieb Eric Blake:
>> On 07/02/2012 04:16 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>
>> Can we discuss the future of 'getfd', the possibility of 'pass-fd', or
>> even the enhancement of all existing monitor commands to take an
>> optional 'nfds' JSON argument for atomic management of fd passing?
>> Which commands need to reopen a file with different access, and do we
>> bite the bullet to special case all of those commands to allow fd
>> passing or can we make qemu_open() coupled with high-level fd passing
>> generic enough to satisfy all of our reopen needs?
>
> Sure we can, at least if Corey will attend the call. Otherwise I guess
> it's better to keep the discussion on the mailing list.
>
> Kevin
>

I'll be on the call.  Thanks for getting this on the agenda.

-- 
Regards,
Corey

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday, July 3rd

[王永博]

does KVM  have the function like vmsafe to develop security software
for Virtualization 。

2012/7/2 Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>:
>
> Hi
>
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
> Later, Juan.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html