From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57268) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sm4Qc-00042m-8t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:50:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sm4QS-0000aN-HJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:50:09 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.213.45]:45650) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sm4QS-0000aD-Aa for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:50:00 -0400 Received: by yhoo21 with SMTP id o21so7026358yho.4 for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 07:49:58 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4FF3068A.50804@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 16:49:46 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1341322722-32691-1-git-send-email-chouteau@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Use clean shutdown request for ctrl-a x List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Fabien Chouteau Il 03/07/2012 16:00, Peter Maydell ha scritto: > I was just talking on #qemu this morning about the equivalent question > of whether the ARM semihosting exit function ought to be doing a > qemu_system_shutdown_request rather than a plain exit()... > > The interesting question for the qemu-char case is whether the code that > feeds this magic byte to us is expecting it to have immediate effect > or is happy to continue execution and let us shut down with a slight > delay. And also whether it is supposed to obey -no-shutdown... Paolo