From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55552)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1SmJF9-0005T1-0K
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 02:39:20 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1SmJF7-0004Vo-Cg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 02:39:18 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:14327)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1SmJF7-0004Vg-4k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 02:39:17 -0400
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q646dFCh006531
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 02:39:15 -0400
Message-ID: <4FF3E510.8020008@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 08:39:12 +0200
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1338963044-21445-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<1338963044-21445-5-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<4FF31286.50000@redhat.com> <4FF317C7.7060109@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FF317C7.7060109@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] blkdebug: store list of active rules
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Am 03.07.2012 18:03, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 03/07/2012 17:40, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
>>>>      case ACTION_INJECT_ERROR:
>>>> -        vars->inject_errno       = rule->options.inject.error;
>>>> -        vars->inject_once        = rule->options.inject.once;
>>>> -        vars->inject_immediately = rule->options.inject.immediately;
>>>> +        if (!injected) {
>>>> +            QSIMPLEQ_INIT(&s->active_rules);
>>>> +            injected = true;
>>>> +        }
>> Does this mean that the next event will invalidate the active rules?
>> Currently it only does so if a rule for the new event exists.
> 
> No, the point of having the injected bool is exactly to keep the
> currently active rules unless a rule exists for the new event.  We
> cannot just do the QSIMPLEQ_INIT in blkdebug_debug_event, that would be
> the behavior you describe.

Ah, yes. Maybe I should learn reading sometime.

Kevin