From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
anthony@codemonkey.ws, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] virtio-blk: disable write cache if not negotiated
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 14:21:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF4353F.8010809@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FF417F3.2090400@redhat.com>
Il 04/07/2012 12:16, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
>> > Yes. It doesn't override cache=unsafe though.
> When the guest doesn't support flushes, cache=writeback is equivalent to
> cache=unsafe, so if you want the old behaviour back you can switch to
> cache=unsafe without additional risks.
>
> We don't have a cache=directunsafe, though, so if you want to get the
> old behaviour of cache=none back, you're out of luck. Not sure how
> acceptable this is.
If we want to fix this, let's take the occasion to split the parameters
into cache=on/off (well, we have that already), flush=on/off, and a
device-side wce=on/off.
> Irrespective of this concern I've come to the conclusion that I agree
> and we actually must enforce this for non-unsafe mode, and not doing it
> is a bug.
Thanks! Is that an Acked-by/Reviewed-by? :)
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-04 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-03 13:20 [Qemu-devel] [QEMU PATCH 0/2] virtio-blk: writeback cache enable improvements Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-03 13:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] virtio-blk: support VIRTIO_BLK_F_CONFIG_WCE Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-03 13:46 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-07-03 13:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-03 13:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] virtio-blk: disable write cache if not negotiated Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-03 13:49 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-07-03 13:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-04 10:16 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-07-04 12:21 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-07-04 12:50 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-07-04 13:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-23 16:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [QEMU PATCH 0/2] virtio-blk: writeback cache enable improvements Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-01 15:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-01 16:25 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FF4353F.8010809@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).