From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43932) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SoA0D-0002Qe-Pd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 05:11:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SoA09-0002Xb-1s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 05:11:33 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44286) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SoA08-0002XN-Q1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 05:11:28 -0400 Message-ID: <4FFAA03D.6020302@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 11:11:25 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1340714974-25489-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] ahci: add -drive support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: Alexander Graf , qemu-devel qemu-devel Am 09.07.2012 10:50, schrieb Markus Armbruster: > Alexander Graf writes: > >> We've had support for creating AHCI devices using -device for a while now, >> but it's cumbersome to users. We really should provide an easier way for >> them to leverage the power of AHCI! >> >> So let's introduce a new if= option to -drive, giving users the same >> command line experience as for scsi or ide. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf >> >> --- >> >> v1 -> v2: >> >> - support more than a single drive per adapter >> - support index= option >> - treat IF_AHCI the same as IF_IDE > > Inhowfar? Not obvious to me from the patch, or the diff patch v1. > >> - add is_ata() helper to match AHCI || IDE > > Not addressed: > > Once we switch to q35, if=ahci will become a redundant wart: to add > drives to the board's AHCI controller, you'll have to use if=ide. > if=ahci will create new controllers, which is generally not what you > want. Ugh. Can we even make it the default with q35 as long as our AHCI controller doesn't also expose a legacy interface for compatibility? Kevin