From: igor <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, aliguori@us.ibm.com,
ehabkost@redhat.com, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, mtosatti@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
blauwirbel@gmail.com, avi@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] target-i386: call x86_cpu_realize() after APIC is initialized.
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:59:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFAB99E.1030203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FE1D1BB.6030709@suse.de>
On 06/20/2012 03:35 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 20.06.2012 14:59, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
>> It's not correct to make CPU runnable (i.e. calling x86_cpu_realize())
>> when not all properties are set (APIC in this case).
>>
>> Fix it by calling x86_cpu_realize() at board level after APIC is
>> initialized, right before cpu_reset().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> hw/pc.c | 1 +
>> target-i386/helper.c | 2 --
>> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/pc.c b/hw/pc.c
>> index 8368701..8a662cf 100644
>> --- a/hw/pc.c
>> +++ b/hw/pc.c
>> @@ -948,6 +948,7 @@ static X86CPU *pc_new_cpu(const char *cpu_model)
>> env->apic_state = apic_init(env, env->cpuid_apic_id);
>> }
>> qemu_register_reset(pc_cpu_reset, cpu);
>> + x86_cpu_realize(OBJECT(cpu), NULL);
>> pc_cpu_reset(cpu);
>> return cpu;
>> }
>> diff --git a/target-i386/helper.c b/target-i386/helper.c
>> index c52ec13..b38ea7f 100644
>> --- a/target-i386/helper.c
>> +++ b/target-i386/helper.c
>> @@ -1161,8 +1161,6 @@ X86CPU *cpu_x86_init(const char *cpu_model)
>> return NULL;
>> }
>>
>> - x86_cpu_realize(OBJECT(cpu), NULL);
>> -
>> return cpu;
>> }
>>
>
> This will require changes in linux-user and possibly bsd-user. Having a
> cpu_realize() would probably help with avoiding #ifdef'ery.
> Unfortunately deriving CPUState from DeviceState proves a bit difficult
> in the meantime (it worked at one point, now there's lots of circular
> header dependencies), and realize support for Object got stopped.
>
> Andreas
>
As alternative to keep, I could leave x86_cpu_realize() in
cpu_x86_init() and keep pc_cpu_reset() in pc_new_cpu(). That will result
in calling cpu_reset() 3 instead of 2 times.
Later when apic_init is moved inside cpu.c, a pc_cpu_reset() in
pc_new_cpu() would be unnecessary and could be cleaned up then.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-09 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-20 12:59 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] target-i386: move cpu reset and tcg intialization inside CPU object Igor Mammedov
2012-06-20 12:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] target-i386: drop usage of prev_debug_excp_handler Igor Mammedov
2012-06-20 13:28 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-06-21 9:29 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-06-20 12:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] target-i386: move tcg initialization into x86_cpu_initfn() Igor Mammedov
2012-06-20 13:17 ` Andreas Färber
2012-06-20 12:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] target-i386: call x86_cpu_realize() after APIC is initialized Igor Mammedov
2012-06-20 13:35 ` Andreas Färber
2012-06-21 9:43 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-06-21 10:14 ` Andreas Färber
2012-06-21 11:59 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-07-09 10:59 ` igor [this message]
2012-07-09 12:57 ` Andreas Färber
2012-07-10 13:35 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-07-11 7:35 ` liu ping fan
2012-07-11 12:27 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-07-12 2:16 ` liu ping fan
2012-07-11 7:32 ` liu ping fan
2012-06-20 12:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] target-i386: move cpu halted decision into x86_cpu_reset Igor Mammedov
2012-06-20 12:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] target-i386: move cpu_reset and reset callback to cpu.c Igor Mammedov
2012-06-21 11:54 ` Igor Mammedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FFAB99E.1030203@redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).