qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Corey Bryant <coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	libvir-list@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/7] file descriptor	passing	using	pass-fd
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 13:35:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFB1657.1090405@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FFAFCB8.8020508@redhat.com>



On 07/09/2012 11:46 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 09.07.2012 17:05, schrieb Corey Bryant:
>> I'm not sure this is an issue with current design.  I know things have
>> changed a bit as the email threads evolved, so I'll paste the current
>> design that I am working from.  Please let me know if you still see any
>> issues.
>>
>> FD passing:
>> -----------
>> New monitor commands enable adding/removing an fd to/from a set.  New
>> monitor command query-fdsets enables querying of current monitor fdsets.
>>    The set of fds should all refer to the same file, with each fd having
>> different access flags (ie. O_RDWR, O_RDONLY).  qemu_open can then dup
>> the fd that has the matching access mode flags.
>>
>> Design points:
>> --------------
>> 1. add-fd
>> -> fd is passed via SCM rights and qemu adds fd to first unused fdset
>> (e.g. /dev/fdset/1)
>> -> add-fd monitor function initializes the monitor inuse flag for the
>> fdset to true
>> -> add-fd monitor function initializes the remove flag for the fd to false
>> -> add-fd returns fdset number and received fd number (e.g fd=3) to caller
>>
>> 2. drive_add file=/dev/fdset/1
>> -> qemu_open uses the first fd in fdset1 that has access flags matching
>> the qemu_open action flags and has remove flag set to false
>> -> qemu_open increments refcount for the fdset
>> -> Need to make sure that if a command like 'device-add' fails that
>> refcount is not incremented
>>
>> 3. add-fd fdset=1
>> -> fd is passed via SCM rights
>> -> add-fd monitor function adds the received fd to the specified fdset
>> (or fails if fdset doesn't exist)
>> -> add-fd monitor function initializes the remove flag for the fd to false
>> -> add-fd returns fdset number and received fd number (e.g fd=4) to caller
>>
>> 4. block-commit
>> -> qemu_open performs "reopen" by using the first fd from the fdset that
>> has access flags matching the qemu_open action flags and has remove flag
>> set to false
>> -> qemu_open increments refcount for the fdset
>> -> Need to make sure that if a command like 'block-commit' fails that
>> refcount is not incremented
>>
>> 5. remove-fd fdset=1 fd=4
>> -> remove-fd monitor function fails if fdset doesn't exist
>> -> remove-fd monitor function turns on remove flag for fd=4
>
> What was again the reason why we keep removed fds in the fdset at all?

Because if refcount is > 0 for the fd set, then the fd could be in use 
by a block device.  So we keep it around until refcount is decremented 
to zero, at which point it is safe to close.

>
> The removed flag would make sense for a fdset after a hypothetical
> close-fdset call because the fdset needs to be kept around until the
> last user closes it, but I think removed fds can be deleted immediately.

fds in an fd set really need to be kept around until zero block devices 
reference them.  At that point, if '(refcount == 0 && (!inuse || 
remove))' is true, then we'll officially close the fd.

>
> I think I might have confused remove-fd and close-fdset in earlier
> emails in this thread, so I hope this isn't inconsistent with what I
> said before.
>

Ok no problem.

>> 6. qemu_close (need to replace all close calls in block layer with
>> qemu_close)
>> -> qemu_close decrements refcount for fdset
>> -> qemu_close closes all fds that have (refcount == 0 && (!inuse || remove))
>> -> qemu_close frees the fdset if no fds remain in it
>>
>> 7. disconnecting the QMP monitor
>> -> monitor disconnect visits all fdsets on monitor and turns off monitor
>> in-use flag for fdset
>
> And close all fds with refcount == 0.
>

Yes, this makes sense.

It also makes sense to close removed fds with refcount == 0 in the 
remove-fd function.  Basically this will be the same thing we do in 
qemu_close.  We'll close any fds that evaulate the following as true:

(refcount == 0 && (!inuse || remove))

>> 8. connecting the QMP monitor
>> -> monitor connect visits all fdsets on monitor and turns on monitor
>> in-use flag for fdset
>>
>> 9. query-fdsets
>> -> returns all fdsets and fds that don't have remove flag on

-- 
Regards,
Corey

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-07-09 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-22 18:36 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/7] file descriptor passing using pass-fd Corey Bryant
2012-06-22 18:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/7] qemu-char: Add MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC flag to recvmsg Corey Bryant
2012-06-22 19:31   ` Eric Blake
2012-06-22 18:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/7] qapi: Convert getfd and closefd Corey Bryant
2012-07-11 18:51   ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-06-22 18:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 3/7] qapi: Add pass-fd QMP command Corey Bryant
2012-06-22 20:24   ` Eric Blake
2012-06-22 18:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/7] qapi: Re-arrange monitor.c functions Corey Bryant
2012-06-22 18:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 5/7] block: Prevent /dev/fd/X filename from being detected as floppy Corey Bryant
2012-06-22 18:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 6/7] block: Convert open calls to qemu_open Corey Bryant
2012-06-22 18:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 7/7] osdep: Enable qemu_open to dup pre-opened fd Corey Bryant
2012-06-22 19:58   ` Eric Blake
     [not found] ` <20120626091004.GA14451@redhat.com>
     [not found]   ` <4FE9A0F0.2050809@redhat.com>
     [not found]     ` <20120626175045.2c7011b3@doriath.home>
     [not found]       ` <4FEA37A9.10707@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
     [not found]         ` <4FEA3D9C.8080205@redhat.com>
2012-07-02 22:02           ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/7] file descriptor passing using pass-fd Corey Bryant
2012-07-02 22:31             ` Eric Blake
2012-07-03  9:07               ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-07-03  9:40               ` Kevin Wolf
2012-07-03 13:42               ` Corey Bryant
2012-07-03 15:40             ` Corey Bryant
2012-07-03 15:59               ` Kevin Wolf
2012-07-03 16:25                 ` Corey Bryant
2012-07-03 17:03                   ` Eric Blake
2012-07-03 17:46                     ` Corey Bryant
2012-07-03 18:00                       ` Eric Blake
2012-07-03 18:21                         ` Corey Bryant
2012-07-04  8:09                           ` Kevin Wolf
2012-07-05 15:06                             ` Corey Bryant
2012-07-09 14:05                               ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-07-09 15:05                                 ` Corey Bryant
2012-07-09 15:46                                   ` Kevin Wolf
2012-07-09 16:18                                     ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-07-09 17:59                                       ` Corey Bryant
2012-07-09 17:35                                     ` Corey Bryant [this message]
2012-07-09 17:48                                       ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-07-09 18:02                                         ` Corey Bryant
2012-07-10  7:53                                       ` Kevin Wolf
2012-07-09 18:20                                   ` Corey Bryant
2012-07-04  8:00                     ` Kevin Wolf
2012-07-05 14:22                       ` Corey Bryant
2012-07-05 14:51                         ` Kevin Wolf
2012-07-05 16:35                           ` Corey Bryant
2012-07-05 16:37                             ` Corey Bryant
2012-07-06  9:06                               ` Kevin Wolf
2012-07-05 17:00                             ` Eric Blake
2012-07-05 17:36                               ` Corey Bryant
2012-07-06  9:11                               ` Kevin Wolf
2012-07-06 17:14                                 ` Corey Bryant
2012-07-06 17:15                                   ` Corey Bryant
2012-07-06 17:40                                 ` Corey Bryant
2012-07-06 18:19                                   ` [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] " Corey Bryant
2012-07-09 14:04                                   ` [Qemu-devel] " Kevin Wolf
2012-07-09 15:23                                     ` Corey Bryant
2012-07-09 15:30                                       ` Kevin Wolf
2012-07-09 18:40   ` Anthony Liguori
2012-07-09 19:00     ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-07-10  8:54       ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-07-10  7:58     ` Kevin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FFB1657.1090405@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).