From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C093C47082 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 20:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A2C761108 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 20:48:08 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0A2C761108 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:54816 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqidr-0006Zz-32 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 16:48:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57310) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqicm-0005fD-3y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 16:47:00 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:51061) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqici-0003B3-9T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 16:46:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1623185215; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7iFIsv8weNI7pBKb9Cr9P4VVovWcGTbIzKRjEhsQWCs=; b=ZBcvNKeNzM4NP2cHmTmp4JF4nuni5dxfYTClGZbblCChmhP3xRYczXa2cfDP2/nV3gPtQC NVYrKpHoimJEDlN+XhX5+yW6nrglKtigp8JxwzIH83BprH7EU+nPMJmIOm6QyOzYFkoXRp zKn09vWb5+zB4yZCktdKUk5N0p56XKo= Received: from mail-ot1-f69.google.com (mail-ot1-f69.google.com [209.85.210.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-48-K2FmEh9SMiuepRatmiAO0g-1; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 16:46:54 -0400 X-MC-Unique: K2FmEh9SMiuepRatmiAO0g-1 Received: by mail-ot1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 19-20020a9d04130000b02903cb28b38d0aso13306126otc.19 for ; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 13:46:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7iFIsv8weNI7pBKb9Cr9P4VVovWcGTbIzKRjEhsQWCs=; b=Z2B2io4xbkgA/5eRYe6306CKfdfSq5bc7P9r55SW9qum+zwmFZkcR6EXY+CySlx5p0 6ynuV5aRJhMt6uMp7TLUd1T64sbsL/e37+A8mCL2cHJw2NRDTF1sleu6WAPGIXiDD9hX 7ruUpmXcVMUafLo2B/ryh6fFgWlBzd9kms43OpUE77tLcQk+HV/MXFzW0rY93LNVVia6 aavefRHjmu/jC/0juYu0PK1d8JUftrXCrKyDm4bCBHIlU8tjX0kf2sxmQ0L4jac2FbDz HPabEWOszQxL3R1tn5qSa8eKrgdIpW4+ynmufDTuvmNCzwDycfEZlXQp8CAKV/c9mMAE JLrQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533dLPwIG9AyCK8hbb8CY3eGnd/BmKSt+NQDPYWOzbwCEInvNgzO c+vHAQUj9pW/N+boOUIvwlZxG274TwPoPLF8aTJfvkZtZmjZTe4iS74xPXte0+QiNvs8pB+5oaO jX32Xzbotb9Vi+ak= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7497:: with SMTP id t23mr11245207otk.124.1623185213664; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 13:46:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzkVohRvikEzk2q34jxBQCsrGZE9jeidvhKjaI7Tg4o5/7n6rfIoTkWF/vB1GPpHfV6uluxxg== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7497:: with SMTP id t23mr11245199otk.124.1623185213518; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 13:46:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.173] (ip68-102-25-99.ks.ok.cox.net. [68.102.25.99]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y16sm1981195oto.60.2021.06.08.13.46.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Jun 2021 13:46:53 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add Connor Kuehl as reviewer for AMD SEV To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" References: <20210608192537.103584-1-ckuehl@redhat.com> From: Connor Kuehl Message-ID: <4a9a1fb2-0be2-a8df-c3cd-7db6619ff729@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 15:46:52 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=ckuehl@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=ckuehl@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.197, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tom Lendacky , Paolo Bonzini , Brijesh Singh , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eduardo Habkost Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 6/8/21 2:34 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: >> Note: because there's no maintainer entry, when running >> ./scripts/get_maintainers.pl on target/i386/sev.c, my name and the qemu >> mailing list is the only thing that shows up... it doesn't even show >> previous committers (as it would before applying this patch). Which is >> probably not great considering I do not make pull requests to QEMU. >> >> Is the way forward to get someone to sign up as a maintainer before >> applying a patch like this? > > If you wanted to do a submaintainer for it and send it to one of the x86 > maintainers rather than having to do full pulls? I'm not opposed to this. I think I have a few of the right people on CC, so let's see if they weigh in on this. Unless it means I have to manage a GPG key again... (just kidding, kind of...) Connor