From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] iotests: Fix 173
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:46:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4aa107c6-db84-006c-962a-81c90933c3a4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191015193503.25591-2-eblake@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1458 bytes --]
On 15.10.19 21:35, Eric Blake wrote:
> This test has been broken since 3.0. It used TEST_IMG to influence
> the name of a file created during _make_test_img, but commit 655ae6bb
> changed things so that the wrong file name is being created, which
> then caused _launch_qemu to fail. In the meantime, the set of events
> issued for the actions of the test has increased.
>
> Why haven't we noticed the failure? Because the test rarely gets run:
> './check -qcow2 173' is insufficient (that defaults to using file protocol)
> './check -nfs 173' is insufficient (that defaults to using raw format)
> so the test is only run with:
> ./check -qcow2 -nfs 173
>
> Note that we already have a number of other problems with -nfs:
> ./check -nfs (fails 18/30)
> ./check -qcow2 -nfs (fails 45/76 after this patch)
> and it's not on my priority list to fix those. Rather, I found this
> because of my next patch's work on tests using _send_qemu_cmd.
>
> Fixes: 655ae6b
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> ---
> tests/qemu-iotests/173 | 4 ++--
> tests/qemu-iotests/173.out | 6 +++++-
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
On second thought, I wonder whether this test actually does anything
with NFS. It doesn’t look like it to me.
I wonder because for some reason I can’t get NFS to work with qemu at
all. I don’t think the iotests are at fault why so many tests fail,
actually.
Max
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-17 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-15 19:35 [PATCH v2 0/3] tests: More iotest 223 improvements Eric Blake
2019-10-15 19:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] iotests: Fix 173 Eric Blake
2019-10-17 11:32 ` Max Reitz
2019-10-17 11:46 ` Max Reitz [this message]
2019-10-17 12:17 ` Max Reitz
2019-10-18 17:00 ` Eric Blake
2019-10-15 19:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] iotests: Include QMP input in .out files Eric Blake
2019-10-17 12:59 ` Max Reitz
2019-10-17 14:42 ` Eric Blake
2019-10-15 19:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] tests: More iotest 223 improvements Eric Blake
2019-10-17 13:07 ` Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4aa107c6-db84-006c-962a-81c90933c3a4@redhat.com \
--to=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).